In this particular book, Poirot
The story (and the murder) was presented through the narrative of Hastings, a guest at the stately home where the murder took place. In this regards, our narrator existed in familiar relation to Poirot...it reminded me of the Holmes/Watson setup. However, in this case, I felt like Hastings was a little less helpful to Poirot than Watson is to Holmes
I only have vague memories of the other books I read by Christie and those memories were mostly that her style and structure sometimes felt repetitive. That said, I really enjoyed this book. Perhaps it's because I haven't read anything by her for a while and thus didn't notice the repetition. Or perhaps the Poirot series is a fresher experience. Whatever the case, it was a fun read.
I had very few qualms about the book. The largest problem I had was the amazing leaps of deduction that felt a little more far fetched than in other books, but were still believable enough. Overall I felt that the mystery, the plot, the writing and the structure of this book was very elegant and engaging.
Mystery fans should give Poirot a try if they haven't already. And if you're just embarking into the world of Poirot, you may as well start with his first adventure
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87a01/87a011d1ad71327bf04ea8a3f53798a703231ad5" alt=""
4 out of 5 stars
View all my reviews
********
Today's Quote from Quoting Quotes:
********
1 comment:
Ugh, I'm so ashamed to say I have not read any Agatha Christie! And I know I should... maybe I'll start with this book first?
Post a Comment